Australia’s government has ruled out a full ban on wagering advertising. Instead, it has landed on a tighter regulatory framework designed to limit children’s exposure to gambling promotions while keeping the broader industry intact.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced the decision at the National Press Club. Minister for Social Services Anika Wells confirmed the package shortly after. Of the three policy options assessed, the government chose Option 2, a comprehensive set of legislative measures enforced by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) under amendments to the Interactive Gambling Act.
What operators and platforms must do
At the core of Option 2 is a triple-lock rule for digital platforms carrying wagering ads. Every user must be signed in. Age must be verified as over 18. And an opt-out must be clearly available. That applies to Netflix, 7plus, Disney+, SBS On Demand, sports apps, social media, podcasts, and general websites alike.
Sports telecasts will not carry any betting advertisements as per the new regulations. Restrictions on advertising frequency will be implemented. The radio will not advertise bets during school hours. Celebrity endorsement is also prohibited. Promotion based on odds is no longer allowed. ACMA acquires the authority to impose guidelines and conduct investigations.
Why Option 2 and not a full ban
The government’s own impact assessment made the trade-offs clear. Option 2 is projected to cut wagering expenditure by 0.8 percent, worth roughly AUD 62.7 million ($43.5 million) a year. The net socio-economic benefit lands at AUD 107.1 million ($74.3 million) annually, pulled from a gross social gain of AUD 182.2 million ($126.4 million) once industry costs are subtracted.
Some 2,461 entities fall within scope. Wagering operators number 180. There are 2,267 broadcasters, four sports codes, five social media platforms, and five streaming services. Total regulatory burden over a decade is estimated at AUD 2.4 million ($1.7 million), though wagering operators alone face AUD 10.9 million ($7.6 million) in compliance costs. Smaller operators carry that weight harder than the majors.
Option 3, the outright ban, would have delivered a higher net benefit of AUD 217.6 million ($151.0 million). But its AUD 139.2 million ($96.6 million) industry cost proved the sticking point. Option 2 keeps the combined burden to around AUD 68.9 million ($47.8 million), roughly half the full-ban figure. That gap is what decided it.
Three years in the making
This did not happen quickly. In June 2023, the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs pushed for national consumer protections, tighter online gambling rules, and stricter advertising limits. Children and live sport were the explicit focal points.
What followed was a prolonged negotiation with an industry that runs deep into Australian media and sport. Wagering revenue underwrites free-to-air broadcasters. It funds competitions from the elite level down. Affiliate networks across publishing and digital depend on it. The politics were never straightforward.
Where things stand
ACMA is now responsible for enforcement. This includes streaming sites, social media, and online broadcasters, as well as its existing role in broadcasting. Quarterly reporting ensures that the compliance process is publicly documented.
Operators are running out of time; ad schedules have to be revamped; promotions have to be pared down; and the triple lock implies technical build-outs on all the digital platforms.
Albanese framed the outcome as a balance. Adults who choose to bet are not penalised. Children are better shielded from saturation advertising during sport. Whether the framework holds to that promise will depend largely on how hard ACMA is willing to push when it finds breaches.
Be part of the action! Join the world’s biggest iGaming community with SiGMA’s Top 10 News countdown. Subscribe HERE for weekly updates, insider insights, and exclusive subscriber-only offers.
