Massachusetts lawmakers are considering new restrictions on sports betting under Senate Bill 302 (SB302), which would ban proposition and in-play bets, introduce daily and monthly wagering limits, and increase the tax rate on gambling operators.
The bill, sponsored by Senator John Keenan, was reported favourably by committee and has been referred to the Senate Ways and Means Committee. Supporters say the proposal aims to address concerns about problem gambling, particularly the rapid and continuous nature of in-play betting.
Proposed ban on in-play betting
In-play betting, also known as live betting, lets people place wagers during a game as events unfold, such as predicting the next basket in basketball or the outcome after half-time. It has become one of the most popular forms of sports gambling, accounting for more than half of wagers on many platforms. Lawmakers in Massachusetts, however, are raising concerns about its rapid-fire nature.
Senator John Keenan has pointed out that the quick turnaround makes it easy for bettors to chase losses immediately, creating risky patterns. Proponents respond that live betting can be kept safe with appropriate regulation and oversight. However, the argument draws attention to the conflict between protecting consumers and preserving one of the most lucrative forms in the business.
Proposed ban on prop bets
Prop bets concentrate on particular in-game occurrences, such as a player’s point total, whether a quarterback scores more than once, or which team scores first. There are concerns that player-specific bets may promote harassment or manipulation in light of recent incidents in professional and collegiate sports.
States have already been pushed by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) to prohibit college prop bets, and several have done so. SB302 in Massachusetts goes one step further and suggests outright prohibiting all prop bets. Critics caution that this could push gamblers to unregulated sites where such wagers are still accessible, while supporters claim it would lower the risks of corruption and safeguard athletes.
Proposed tax increase for sportsbooks
One of the most debated parts of Massachusetts’ SB302 is the proposed tax hike on sportsbook operators. The current tax rate on mobile sports betting revenue is 20 percent, but the bill would raise it to 51 percent, a jump of 155 percent that would put Massachusetts among the highest-tax states for sports betting, alongside New York, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island.
Supporters of the measure argue that the gambling industry generates significant profits and should contribute more to public services. At the same time, critics warn that the higher tax burden could discourage competition and investment in the state.
Betting limits for players
SB302 in Massachusetts proposes strict limits on how much individuals can wager. The bill sets a cap of $1,000 per day and $10,000 per month, aimed at curbing excessive losses. The legislation also introduces affordability checks, requiring sportsbooks to ensure that wagers do not exceed 15 percent of a bettor’s available bank balance once limits are surpassed.
Supporters see this as a safeguard against financial harm, while critics raise concerns about privacy and the practicality of verifying personal financial information. Together, these measures mark one of the most stringent approaches to regulating betting activity in the US.
What happens next
After overcoming its initial obstacle in Massachusetts, SB302 is now on its way to the Senate Ways and Means Committee, where senators will examine its economic effects and take amendments into consideration. It might then proceed to a full Senate vote, the House, and, in order to become law, the governor’s signature. Given the breadth of its suggestions, the betting industry is fiercely opposed to the law.
Brazil’s not waiting, and neither should you. BiS SiGMA South America, 06–09 April 2026, brings 18,500 delegates, 250+ sponsors to LatAm’s gaming capital. São Paulo’s bringing more sizzle than a beachside samba. Get in early or get left behind.