Pennsylvania lawmakers push safeguards for skill games
Pennsylvania State Representative Ben Waxman (D-Philadelphia) is circulating legislation to regulate skill games in Pennsylvania, focusing on player safeguards and local control. The unregulated nature of skill games, which are frequently seen in pubs, convenience stores, and petrol stations, raises questions about consumer protection and their resemblance to conventional slot machines.
Lawmakers and regulators are increasingly seeking standardised rules, taxation frameworks, and oversight to address potential risks, including accessibility to vulnerable populations and gambling addiction.
New legislative push
Waxman introduced the Skill Game Consumer Protection Act to address the growing presence of skill games in the state. The plan takes a middle-of-the-road stance, acknowledging the economic function of these machines while attempting to control them with protections, as opposed to either banning or accepting them.
The legislation sets out baseline protections that would apply if skill games were formally legalised, ensuring consumer safety is built into any future framework. Its objectives include protecting players through limits and responsible gaming measures, enhancing oversight with centralised monitoring, and giving local communities authority over where and how the machines operate.
Centralised oversight and player protection
Waxman’s proposal in Pennsylvania places skill games under the oversight of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB). A key feature is a centralised monitoring system that connects every machine to a single network. Regulators could then track gameplay, revenue, and irregularities in real time, like how casino machines are monitored. By shifting skill games into the PGCB’s jurisdiction, the plan aligns them with the state’s existing casino regulations.
The proposal also includes several measures to protect players from the risks posed by unregulated skill games. One provision sets limits on play speed and requires mandatory breaks, slowing down continuous gameplay and reducing the likelihood of compulsive behaviour.
The legislation introduces daily loss caps, restricting how much money a player can lose in 24 hours. Another key element is a ban on deceptive game design. Practices that make players feel as though they are winning when they are not would be prohibited, ensuring greater transparency and fairness.
As discussions around gaming regulation continue to evolve, comparisons are often drawn with digital gambling environments such as top-rated online casinos, where structured oversight and player protection measures are already well established.
Location restrictions
The measure also deals with the placement of skill games. One clause proposes restricting or outlawing their appearance in convenience stores and petrol stations, which are busy places frequently visited by children and vulnerable people. The municipal authority’s responsibility is also emphasised by the statute. The authority to determine whether or not skill games are allowed within their borders would be granted to municipal administrations.
The plan put up by Waxman also allocates a portion of the profits from skill games to initiatives that deal with problem gambling. Instead of depending solely on public health budgets, the goal is to guarantee that industry directly provides funding for treatment and prevention.
Competing bills and tax proposals
Lawmakers in Pennsylvania are still at odds-on how-to tax and regulate the skill game sector. There are many other proposals, ranging from taxing the machines at a high rate of up to 35 per cent to not taxing them at all. Legislative deadlock brought on by this disagreement has slowed the development of any cohesive strategy.
The debate over skill games in Harrisburg comes down to a fundamental disagreement between lawmakers. Rep. Kerry Benninghoff stands firmly against additional taxes, while Sen. Gene Yaw pushes for heavier regulation and taxation, leaving the future of this legislation very much up in the air. Proposals on the table range from full legalisation with strict oversight to partial restrictions or an outright ban.
Subscribe HERE to SiGMA’s Top 10 News countdown and SiGMA’s weekly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest iGaming News from the world’s iGaming authority, and benefit from subscriber-only offers.
