Slovakia is embroiled in a heated political dispute that threatens to destabilise its already fragile coalition government. At the centre of the controversy lies a gambling reform bill that, while aimed at boosting state revenues, also raises sensitive social and ethical concerns.
A proposal that sparks division
The clash began with an amendment to the gambling law put forward by MPs from the rural party Strana vidieka. The draft would grant new powers to the state-owned company Tipos, overseen by tourism and sports minister Rudolf Huliak. Under the plan, Tipos could operate slot machines and open casinos in hotels and shopping centres without the consent of local municipalities.
The proposal would also lift restrictions on lotteries during public holidays and periods of national mourning. Huliak defended the initiative, insisting it is not an expansion of gambling opportunities but a measure to strengthen state oversight, combat illegal gaming, and prevent money laundering.
Taraba’s fierce opposition
The most vocal opposition has come from environment minister Tomáš Taraba of the Slovak National Party. He has demanded uniform taxation for land-based casinos and online gaming, describing operators as “profiteers of human misery”. Taraba rejected the idea of stripping municipalities of the right to block new gambling venues, framing the issue as one of values and family protection.
Tensions escalated when Huliak accused Taraba of acting in the interests of financial group Penta, owner of online betting firm Fortuna SK. The exchange has further fuelled divisions within the coalition.
Taxation: the core dispute
At the heart of the dispute is taxation. Currently, land-based casinos pay an effective rate of 17%, compared with 27% for online gambling. The finance ministry has proposed harmonising both at 30%. Huliak, following a preliminary agreement with the prime minister, suggested a compromise: 30% for online operators and 21% for land-based venues.
This formula has been rejected by Christian democrats, who argue that the most visible gambling outlets – those located in town centres – create the greatest social impact and should therefore bear heavier tax burdens.
Industry concerns
Beyond politics, the gambling sector itself has voiced unease. The Gambling Regulatory Institute has warned that excessive tax hikes could push players towards illegal platforms, reducing overall state revenues. Industry association AZAH, representing casinos, has sided with Huliak, warning that higher taxation would force operators to slash the number of slot machines, ultimately shrinking revenues rather than increasing them.
Civil society pushback
Civic movements, opposition parties, and public officials have condemned the reform as a threat to local autonomy and family values. Children’s commissioner Jozef Mikloško argued that state-run casinos would undermine democratic principles, while the opposition party Demokrati branded Huliak “the government’s big gambler”.
Critics fear that greater state involvement in the gambling industry will amplify social harms, from addiction and debt to broader impacts on households and communities.
Record numbers and future prospects
The debate unfolds against the backdrop of a booming sector. In 2024, Slovaks spent around €24 billion on gambling, generating €1.45 billion in net revenues and €347 million in taxes for the state and local authorities. Supporters of the reform claim it could deliver an additional €320 million annually by curbing the black market.
Yet detractors argue that the economic benefits risk being offset by social costs, which could outweigh fiscal gains. Moreover, constitutional experts have raised doubts over the legality of stripping municipalities of their veto rights, raising the possibility of challenges before the Constitutional Court.
A battle still unresolved
The Slovak gambling reform has become a complex battle of politics, economics, and social values. On one side lies the ambition to tighten state control and boost tax revenues; on the other, the fear that expanded gambling opportunities and curtailed local powers will harm families and communities.
The ultimate fate of the bill will hinge on the government’s ability to balance fiscal goals with regulatory safeguards and social protection. What is already clear is that the dispute has laid bare deep rifts within the ruling coalition and underlined the difficulty of reconciling economic interests with broader societal concerns.
This article was first published in Italian on 5 September 2025.
All roads lead to Rome, 03–06 November 2025. SiGMA Central Europe takes centre stage at the Fiera Roma, uniting 30,000 delegates, 1,200 exhibitors, and 700+ speakers. This is where legacies are built, and the future takes shape. Connect with the innovators’ driving change.
