NCAA reverses course on allowing athletes to bet on pro sports
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has officially reversed its decision to allow student-athletes and athletics department staff to legally bet on professional sports. After a 30-day review period, more than two-thirds of Division I schools voted to rescind the rule change, meaning the long-standing ban on betting remains in place across all three NCAA divisions.
The rule, originally approved on 22 October, was set to take effect on 1 November, which was then postponed to 22 November. The decision would have allowed wagering on professional sports while maintaining a strict ban on betting related to NCAA events. However, because the proposal received less than 75 percent support from the Division I cabinet, all DI member institutions were given 30 days to challenge it, a rarely used procedural measure that ultimately led to the reversal.
As sports betting rules are common legislation shared across the association, the vote applies to Divisions I, II and III, keeping the prohibition intact for all college athletes and athletics staff.
Integrity fears amid gambling scandals
The swift rollback comes at a time when both professional and collegiate sports are battling mounting betting-related controversies. In late October, the National Basketball Association (NBA) was rocked by a law enforcement sting that led to the arrest of an NBA coach and player in connection with sprawling illegal gambling operations. Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier and Portland Trail Blazers coach Chauncey Billups were among those arrested in connection with alleged gambling and poker schemes.
Major League Baseball (MLB) has also faced suspensions and investigations tied to betting irregularities, with Cleveland Guardians pitchers Emmanuel Clase and Luis Ortiz being indicted, concerns have intensified about whether rapid gambling market expansion is eroding public trust in sport.
College athletics has been far from immune. Two weeks ago, the NCAA revoked the eligibility of six men’s basketball players over alleged betting violations. Former Temple guard Hysier Miller was also disciplined after an investigation found he placed dozens of wagers on Owls games, including several bets against his own team. At least a dozen other NCAA enforcement cases are under active review.
These developments have led athletic directors, compliance officials, and conference leaders to warn that policy loosening could widen opportunities for match-fixing, misuse of inside information, and athlete exploitation.
SEC officials led pushback
One of the most vocal opponents of the rule was Southeastern Conference (SEC) Commissioner Greg Sankey, who sent a formal letter to NCAA President Charlie Baker urging the association to reconsider. Sankey argued the proposal threatened to erase the “long-standing guardrails” separating college sports from the gambling industry.
“If there are legal or practical concerns about the prior policy, those should be addressed through careful refinement — not through wholesale removal of the guardrails that have long supported the integrity of games and the well-being of those who participate,” Sankey wrote.
SEC presidents and chancellors were unanimously opposed to the policy change during an October meeting, calling the shift “a major step in the wrong direction.”
NCAA acknowledged modern landscape but pulls back
When first approved, the NCAA argued the revised betting rules reflected the realities of the modern US sports wagering environment. Officials said the change was developed with input from the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG) and mental health experts to balance integrity protections with real-world betting participation.
More than 100,000 coaches, athletes, and administrators have completed responsible gambling training developed in partnership with EPIC Global Solutions. The NCAA Sport Science Institute has also distributed guidance on mental health support and prevention of gambling addiction.
Supporters of reform said regulated, limited betting could help reduce stigma and improve transparency. Yet the decisive membership vote shows that, for now, the majority of colleges believe separation from the betting industry remains essential to protecting athlete welfare and competition integrity.
Stay ahead of iGaming’s biggest stories with SiGMA’s Top 10 News countdown. The world’s biggest iGaming community brings you weekly insights and subscriber-only offers. Join HERE today.
