Sweden targets early gambling risk with shorter 10-day pause
Sweden has added a 10-day self-exclusion period to Spelpaus, its national gambling programme, testing whether a shorter step away from gambling can bring more players into the protection system before harm becomes entrenched.
The new option gives players a shorter alternative to the longer pauses already available through the regulator-run service.
In comments to SiGMA News, the regulator linked the decision to its 2023 government assignment on Spelpaus and said the change “should be seen as a first step in meeting the demand that has emerged regarding exclusion options on Spelpaus.”
The change points to a different theory of intervention: some players may step into protection sooner when the first commitment feels less severe.
A lower threshold for self-exclusion
Until now, Spelpaus has been built around longer exclusions. The regulator’s new option, however, recognises a problem familiar to safer gambling teams. Some customers know they need a break, but hesitate when the shortest formal pause feels too big.
Spelinspektionen told SiGMA News that the one-month minimum “felt like too large a step for some players, even when their need was only for a brief pause.” The 10-day period, it said, is “short enough to feel accessible, but long enough that it isn’t merely symbolic — once confirmed, it cannot be reversed early, just like the longer options.”
The regulator said the case for the new option came from survey evidence showing that “around half of respondents said they wanted additional exclusion period options”, while several users described the one-month minimum as “a barrier — a decision that felt too big”.
That makes the 10-day pause a tool for a particular moment. It could cover a payday weekend, a period after heavy losses, or a short spell when a player recognises the risk of continuing but is not ready to self-exclude for a month or more.
Spelinspektionen said the 10-day pause is intended “to reach a different moment of need, rather than a different type of player.” It is aimed at someone who recognises the need for “an immediate, complete stop” but may hesitate to commit to a full month.
The regulator also cautioned that the new option “is not intended to replace longer periods for those with more established gambling problems”, where sustained protection still depends on longer exclusions remaining available.
What users say about stopping
Research into Spelpaus users helps explain why a smaller self-exclusion window may still carry weight. A 2025 qualitative study in JMIR Human Factors interviewed 15 people who had used Spelpaus. It found that self-exclusion was often linked to financial pressure, family strain, loss of control and a need to interrupt gambling urges.
One participant described the value of making the block irreversible: “This is the good thing, that it is a stop. You can’t make a phone call, you can’t just change your mind, because now it is a stop.”
Another described the mental relief that came once access had been removed: “You can relax because you have given away the control to something else…once I have chosen to self-exclude, I cannot do anything about it…and I get so mentally relaxed, I do not have to think about it at all anymore.”
According to Spelinspektionen, the underlying report also found that “most people who exclude themselves make that decision without extended deliberation”, a finding that supports lowering the entry threshold rather than making the first step harder.
The lesson for operators is practical: duration is only one part of self-exclusion, friction is another. Even a 10-day block can interrupt impulse-driven gambling if it is comprehensive, immediate and impossible to cancel early.
But the same research also highlights a risk after self-exclusion ends. One participant said: “After the self-exclusion ended, the advertising started coming again. It becomes like a reminder. So one could simply get going and gamble again!”
That risk might be especially relevant after a 10-day pause. A customer returning after a short exclusion may have used the tool during what the regulator described as “a financially risky period”, or as a first step before considering longer-term protection.
The market signal
Sweden’s decision comes as Spelinspektionen is also tightening how operators verify customers against Spelpaus. From August 2026, licensed operators will have to use their own credentials and the correct technical interface when checking the register.
Together, the two developments point in the same direction. Sweden wants self-exclusion to be easier for customers to enter and easier for the regulator to audit.
Spelinspektionen told SiGMA News it will track uptake of the 10-day option and whether it is used as a standalone measure or “as a stepping stone toward longer exclusions.”
The regulator said the 10-day option fits into its established approach to evaluating Spelpaus, including “recurring survey data collection”, self-exclusion register statistics and follow-up studies on why people exclude themselves. Those studies also look at whether players continue gambling, “including on unlicensed sites”, during an exclusion period.
The outcome may be relevant beyond Sweden. If the shorter option brings in players who would otherwise have stayed outside Spelpaus, it could strengthen the case for lower-threshold exclusion tools. If many users return quickly to gambling, attention will shift to how operators manage customers after a short exclusion ends.
Don’t just read the news, stay ahead of it. Subscribe HERE to SiGMA’s Top 10 News countdown for stories shaping iGaming’s future, weekly insights from the world’s biggest iGaming community, and exclusive subscriber-only offers.
