Amazon agrees to pay over $200M to settle social casino lawsuit
Amazon has agreed to settle a class-action lawsuit over its role in processing payments for virtual casino chips purchased through social casino apps on the Amazon Appstore. The proposed settlement could allow consumers to recover more than $200 million, although app developers, rather than Amazon, are expected to bear the financial responsibility under the agreement, as reported by SBCAmericas. The settlement is subject to approval by a federal court in Washington.
Social casino games look harmless at first. Players do not cash out real money winnings, but they do buy virtual chips to keep playing poker, blackjack, roulette, or slots. Horn argued that these games are essentially gambling because people spend real money on chips that allow them to continue playing games of chance.
Steven Horn filed a lawsuit against Amazon in November 2023, claiming that Amazon had committed fraud against him by acting as a single payment processor for in-app purchases within social casino games, in violation of Washington’s Consumer Protection Act and gambling laws. Amazon first denied any wrongdoing in the matter but later chose to settle the dispute.
The lawsuit claimed that Amazon did more than just host the programmes; it also processed every purchase through its App Store, taking around 30 per cent of each transaction. According to Horn, this made Amazon an active participant in unlawful gambling rather than simply a marketplace. Amazon rejected this, stating that developers are responsible for complying with the law.
Why Amazon agreed to settle
Amazon’s decision to settle the case rather than plead guilty ensured that it would not be found liable. The advantage of settling is that it spares the company from the complications that come with prolonged legal proceedings, saves money, and limits reputational damage. The company operates one of the world’s largest online marketplaces, and an adverse ruling on its financial activities could have led to further cases.
The other concern is the ever-changing legal environment. Several court opinions indicate that in various locations, courts are becoming more open to determining whether app stores and payment processors are liable for any concerns arising from customers’ purchases of virtual products. Even if Amazon believed it had a high chance of winning the lawsuit, it still faced many years of litigation and growing costs.
Breaking down $201M settlement
The proposed $201 million settlement is not a direct cash payout. Instead of Amazon paying consumers, the agreement establishes a framework for reimbursement through litigation against social casino developers.
Court filings show the figure equals about 30 per cent of every dollar spent on virtual chips through the Amazon App Store during the relevant period. The calculation is based on transaction records and Amazon’s contracts with 32 developers. To manage this, the agreement creates a litigation trust that will use Amazon’s indemnification rights to pursue recovery from those developers.
This approach transfers financial responsibility away from Amazon while still allowing customers to recover losses. Amazon will spend $2.5 million to fund administrative costs, including notifying class members, processing claims, and managing the settlement.
The Edelson PC Amazon Social Casino Litigation Trust will act as the legal channel for class members to seek compensation from developers. If approved, class members agree not to pursue claims directly against Amazon. Instead, Amazon transfers its contractual rights to the trust, which can seek reimbursement from developers who agreed to indemnify Amazon under App Store contracts.
The agreement identifies 32 developers that created software enabling these transactions. These developers’ contracts with Amazon included indemnification clauses requiring them to compensate Amazon for any legal costs incurred if claims were brought against the company.
Similar challenges
Amazon is not alone in facing legal challenges over social casino games. Apple, Google, and Meta have all been accused of promoting gambling games on their respective platforms.
A notable case, brought in 2024 by a New Jersey resident against technology corporations Apple, Google, and several sweepstakes casino providers, is based on claimed violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. According to the plaintiff’s case, technology businesses provided gaming software and payment platforms to support the casinos’ operations. Despite the fact that the defendants contest the claims, the lawsuits demonstrate that legal claims have become increasingly platform-oriented rather than developer-specific.
Another major development came when US District Judge Edward Davila refused to dismiss class-action lawsuits against Apple, Google, and Meta. These cases claim the companies profited from social casino platforms that exposed users to gambling-related harm.
Amazon’s proposed payment could signal a significant shift in how gambling apps on platforms and even courts handle such instances. This is because gambling applications allow gamblers to play with virtual rather than real money. According to commentators, the verdict may encourage app shops to closely monitor gambling apps. However, it should be noted that the settlement will require judicial approval before going into effect. Nonetheless, the proposed settlement suggests that firms may no longer be able to avoid responsibility by pretending to be impartial middlemen.
Subscribe HERE to SiGMA’s Top 10 News countdown and SiGMA’s weekly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest iGaming News from the biggest iGaming community in the world and benefit from subscriber-only offers.
